Companion Dogs as Surrogate Family Members and the Compensation Hypothesis

Marcos Díaz Videla

Resumen


The belief that bonding with companion animals seeks to substitute for human relationships has been widely held as common knowledge, receiving partial support even by scientific literature. This study aimed to assess the effect of compensation of lacking human bonds (i.e., partner and children) through bonding with companion dogs. For this, 425 adults living in Buenos Aires, who own a companion dog, filled out a form about Perceived Emotional Closeness and another one about anthropomorphism towards dogs. The fact of having children, regardless of the cohabitation with them and the guardian’s marital status, was linked to lower scores of emotional closeness; however, there were no differences in terms of the levels of dog’s anthropomorphism between guardians who lived with a couple or not, between those who had children or not, neither between those who lived with their children or not. Furthermore, among parent guardians, there was no difference in the levels of Anthropomorphism and Perceived Emotional Closeness in relationship with their children’s age. We concluded that dogs seem to have their own particular role within their guardian’s close circle of relationships, instead of competing with human family roles. Guardians who consider their dog as a child would not imply the substitution for absent children. For these guardians, this consideration would be rather related to their affection towards the dog. The differences in the emotional closeness among guardians with or without children are discussed according to a possible attitudinal change, after parenthood, that would lead to a lower interspecies affective permeability. Considering the particular role of dogs in the guardian’s emotional circle can lead us to the appraisal of the differential aspects of this interspecies relationship with positive consequences for both, humans and dogs.


Palabras clave


anthropomorphism, companion animal; dogs; emotional closeness; family

Citas


Albert, A., & Bulcroft, K. (1988). Pets, Families, and the Life Course. Journal of Marriage & Family, 50(2), 543-552. https://www.jstor.org/stable/352019

Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6-47. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-45084-001

Archer, J. (1997). Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human behavior, 18(4), 237-259. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162309599800014

Archer, J. (2011). Pet keeping: A case study in maladaptive behavior. In C. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.). The oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (pp. 281-296). Oxford University Press.

Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121-145. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853096x00115

Bodsworth, W., & Coleman, G. J. (2001). Child–companion animal attachment bonds in single and two-parent families. Anthrozoös, 14(4), 216-223. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279301786999391

Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2016). Pet Face: Mechanisms Underlying Human-Animal Relationships. Frontiers in psychology, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298/full

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

Boya, U. O., Dotson, M. J., & Hyatt, E. M. (2012). Dimensions of the dog–human relationship: A segmentation approach. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(2), 133-143. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/jt.2012.8

Cohen, S. P. (2002). Can pets function as family members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6), 621-638. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/019394502320555386

Díaz Videla, M. (2015). El miembro no humano de la familia: las mascotas a través del ciclo vital familiar. Revista Ciencia Animal, (9), 83-98. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44187531/REVISTA_CIENCIA_ANIMAL_-_El_miembro_no_humano_de_la_familia_-_Las_mascotas_a_traves_del_ciclo_vital_familiar.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1533153905&Signature=gWBwzYd94NmSnceRcAKIxiKljzg%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DEl_miembro_no_humano_de_la_familia_Las_m.pdf

Dwyer, F., Bennett, P. C., & Coleman, G. J. (2006). Development of the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale (MDORS). Anthrozoös, 19(3), 243-256. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279306785415592

Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x

Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological review, 114(4), 864. http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2007-13558-002.html

Fatjó, J., Darder, P., Calvo, P., Bowen, J., & Bulbena, A. (2013). Is dog ownership the same for men and women, parents and non-parents? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 4(8), 44. https://www.journalvetbehavior.com/article/S1558-7878(13)00093-2/abstract

George, D., & Mallery, P. (1994). SPSS/PC + step by step: A simple guide and reference. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Harker, R. M., Collis, G. M., & McNicholas, J. (2000). The influence of current relationships upon pet animal acquisition. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul & J. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp.189–208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, T. P., Garrity, T. F., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5(3), 160-175. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2752/089279392787011395

Kanat-Maymon, Y., Antebi, A., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2016). Basic psychological need fulfillment in human–pet relationships and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 69-73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915301070

Levinson, B. M. (1969). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

Martens, P., Enders-Slegers, M. J., & Walker, J. K. (2016). The emotional lives of companion animals: Attachment and subjective claims by owners of cats and dogs. Anthrozoös, 29(1), 73-88. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08927936.2015.1075299

McConnell, A. R., Brown, C. M., Shoda, T. M., Stayton, L. E., & Martin, C. E. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequences of pet ownership. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(6), 1239. http://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2011-13783-001.html

Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., ... & Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333-336. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6232/333.short

Nagasawa, M., Mogi, K., & Kikusui, T. (2009). Attachment between humans and dogs. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(3), 209-221. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2009.00402.x

Paul, E. S. (2000). Love of pets and love of people. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul & J. A. Serpell (Eds), Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets (pp. 168-186). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Power, E. (2008). Furry families: making a human–dog family through home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535-555. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14649360802217790

Sanders, C. R. (1993). Understanding dogs. Caretakers' attributions of mindedness in canine-human relationships. Journal of contemporary ethnography, 22(2), 205-226. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/089124193022002003

Sanders, C. R. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405-426. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405

Serpell, J. A. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human-animal relationships. Cambridge University Press.

Serpell, J. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism and anthropomorphic selection-Beyond the "cute response". Society and Animals, 11(1), 83-100. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156853002320936926

Serpell, J. A., & Paul, E. (2011). Pets in the family: An evolutionary perspective. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of evolutionary family psychology (298-309). Oxford University Press.

Shir‐Vertesh, D. (2012). “Flexible personhood”: Loving animals as family members in Israel. American Anthropologist, 114(3), 420-432. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01443.x

Turner, W. G. (2005). The role of companion animals throughout the family life cycle. Journal Of Family Social Work, 9(4), 11-21. doi: 10.1300/J039v09n04̱02 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J039v09n04_02

Walsh, F. (2009). Human-Animal Bonds II: The Role of Pets in Family Systems and Family Therapy. Family Process, 48(4), 481-499. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01297.x

Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(4), 345-357. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656611000584

Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Pets as safe havens and secure bases: The moderating role of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 571-580. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656612001079




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780.2020.12.1.65726