Bienestar Subjetivo-Hedónico y Psicológico-Eudaimónico y el uso de Protección para el Cuidado de la Salud Física en la Sexualidad

Contenido principal del artículo

John Alexander Castro Muñoz

Resumen

El estudio de la promoción de la salud sexual ha considerado ampliamente variables psicosociales, como la psicoeducación, algunos auto esquemas como la autoeficacia, entre otras, sin contemplar la participación del bienestar, a pesar de la evidencia existente sobre su vinculación con los hábitos y comportamientos de vida saludable. De acuerdo con ello, se realizó un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, correlacional de corte transversal no experimental para analizar, desde la psicología positiva, la relación entre la percepción de bienestar hedónico, bienestar eudaimónico, y la practica sexual protegida. Participaron 460 adultos jóvenes con edades entre los 18 y 35 años (M=22,00; DE: 3,62) residentes en la ciudad de Bogotá, Colombia. Para el cumplimiento de los objetivos se realizaron los análisis de estadística descriptiva e inferencial correspondientes, y en el caso de la construcción de una de las escalas, los análisis psicométricos. Los resultados no evidenciaron diferencias significativas en función del sexo, aunque si relaciones significativas entre las dos formas de bienestar y la práctica sexual protegida. Al final se discuten las implicaciones del abordaje del bienestar para la promoción y prevención de la salud sexual.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Castro Muñoz, J. A. (2021). Bienestar Subjetivo-Hedónico y Psicológico-Eudaimónico y el uso de Protección para el Cuidado de la Salud Física en la Sexualidad. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 13(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780e.2021.13.1.78074

Citas

Baum, W. M. (1995). Introduction to molar behavior analysis. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 21, 7-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v21.i1.ESP.25408

Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95

Baum, W. M. (2005). Understanding behaviorism: behavior, culture and evolution (2da. Ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101

Baum, W. M. & Davison, M. (2014a). Choice with frequently-changing food rates and food ratios. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 246-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70

Baum, W. M. & Davison, M. (2014b). Background activities, induction and behavioral allocation in operant performance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102, 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.100

Brown, M. F. (1992). Does a cognitive map guide choices in the radial-arm maze? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.18.1.56

Cabrera, F. & Ortega, S. (2017). Affordance for reaching behavior: rats change limb preferences while reaching for food. Studies in Perception & Action XIV, 69-72.

Cabrera, F., Covarrubias, P. y Jiménez, Á. A. (2009). Sistemas conductuales desde una aproximación ecológica. En: Varela, J.A., Cabrera, F., Irigoyen, J.J. (Eds.), Estudios sobre comportamiento y aplicaciones Vol. 1 (pp. 31-50). México: Universidad de Guadalajara.

Cabrera, F., Jiménez, A. & Covarrubias, P. (2015). Discriminanda, manipulanda, utilitanda: el concepto de soporte conductual de Edward C. Tolman revisitado. En F. Cabrera, O. Zamora, H. Martínez, P. Covarrubias y V. Orduña (Coords.). Estudios sobre comportamiento y aplicaciones, volumen IV (p. 29-59). México: UNAM-Universidad de Guadalajara.

Cabrera, F., Jiménez, Á. A., & Covarrubias, P. (2019). Timberlake’s behavior systems: A paradigm shift toward an ecological approach. Behavioural Processes, 167, 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2019.103892

Cabrera, F., Robayo-Castro, B. Covarrubias, P. (2010). The ‘Huautli’ alternative: Amaranth as reinforcer in operant procedures. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 36, 71-91.

Camacho, J. A. & Cabrera, F. (2014). Allocation of behavior in a simple discrimination task. Conductual, 2, 3, 4-16.

De La Casa, L. G. & Timberlake, W. (2006). Effects of preexposure and retention interval placement on latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a choice-maze discrimination task. Learning & Behavior, 34, 2, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193194

Fetterman, J.G. (1996). Dimensions of stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.3

Gibson, E. J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 29-56. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.000333

Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hänninen, L. & Pastell, M. (2009). CowLog: open-source software for coding behaviors from digital video. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 472-176. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.472

Harzem, P., Lowe, C. F. & Spencer, P. T. (1978). Temporal control of behavior: Schedule interactions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.30-255

Hoffman, C. M., Timberlake, W., Leffel, J. & Gont, R. (1999). How is radial arm maze behavior in rats related to locomotor search tactics? Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 4, 426-444. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209979

Hu, D., Xu, X., & González-Lima, F. (2006). Vicarious trial-and-error behavior and hippocampal cytochrome oxidase activity during Y-maze discrimination learning in the rat. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116, 265-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450500403108

Killeen, P. R. & Jacobs, K. W. (2017). Coal is not black, snow in not White, food is not a reinforcer: The roles of affordance and dispositions in the Analysis of Behavior. Behavior Analyst, 40, 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7

Killeen, P. R. & Pellón, R. (2013). Adjuntive behaviors are operants. Learning & Behavior, 41, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-012-0095-1

Krebs, J. R., & McCleery, R. H. (1984). Optimization in behavioral ecology. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.). Behavioural ecology (2nd ed., pp. 91-121). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Lotfizadeh, A. D., Edwards, T. L., Redner, R. & Poling, A. (2012). Motivating Operations Affect Stimulus Control: A Largely Overlooked Phenomenon in Discrimination Learning. Behavior Analyst, 35, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392268.

Lowe, C. F. & Harzem, P. (1977). Species differences in temporal control of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1977.28-189

Lubow, R. E. (1997). Latent inhibition as a measure of learned inattention: some problems and solutions. Behavioural Brain Research, 88, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(97)02307-3

Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.87

McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200258

Nadel, L., & Willner, J. (1980). Context and conditioning: A place for space. Physiological Psychology, 8, 218-228.

Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-062-Z00-1999.

Olton, D. S. (1982). Staying and shifting: Their effect on discrimination learning. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & H. Rachlin (Eds.). Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol.2. Matching and maximizing accounts (pp. 205-226). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

Roche, J. P. & Timberlake, W. (1998). The influence of artificial paths and landmarks on the foraging behavior of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 1, 76-84. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199163

Rojas-Leguizamón, M., Yañez, N. & Cabrera, F. (2019). Spatial memory in hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus): Depleting/Replenishing environments and pre-choice behaviors in the Radial Arm Maze. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 32, 1-8.

Saltzman, I. J. (1949). Maze learning in the absence of primary reinforcement: a study of secondary reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 42, 161–173.

Terrace, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.). Operant Behavior: areas of research and application (pp. 271-344). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

Timberlake, W. & Lucas, G.A., (1991). Periodic water, interwater interval, and adjunctive behavior in a 24-hour multi-response environment. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 369-380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197898

Timberlake, W. (1984). An ecological approach to learning. Learning & Motivation, 15, 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(84)90001-8

Timberlake, W. (1990). Natural learning in laboratory paradigms. In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.), Contemporary issues in comparative psychology (pp. 31-54). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. https://doi.org/10.1037/11525-002

Timberlake, W. (1993). Behavior Systems and reinforcement: an integrative approach. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-105

Timberlake, W. (1994). Behavior systems, associationism and Pavlovian conditioning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 405-420. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210945

Timberlake, W. (2001). Integrating niche-related and general process approaches in the study of learning. Behavioural Processes, 54, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00151-6

Timberlake, W. (2002). Niche-related learning in laboratory paradigms: the case of maze behavior in laboratory rats. Behavior & Brian Research, 134, 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00048-7

Timberlake, W. (2004). Is the operant contingency enough for a science of behavior? Behavior & Philosophy, 32, 197-229.

Timberlake, W., & Hoffman, C.M. (2002). How does the ecological foraging behavior of desert kangaroo rats (Dipodomys deserti) relate to their behavior in radial mazes? Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 342-354. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195959

Timberlake, W., & Wozny, M. (1979). Reversibility of reinforcement between eating and running by schedule changes: A comparison of hypotheses and models. Animal Learning & Behavior, 7(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209702

Timberlake, W., Leffel, J., & Hoffman, C. M. (1999). Stimulus control and function of arm and wall travel by rats on a radial arm floor maze. Animal Learning & Behavior, 27, 445-460. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209980

Tolman, E.C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century C.

Tolman, E.C. (1938). The determiners of behavior at a choice point. Psychological Review, 45, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062733

Tonneau, F., Cabrera, F., y Corujo, A. (2012). Hamsters’ (Mesocricetus auratus) memory in a radial maze analog: The role of spatial versus olfactory cues. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025019

Williams, K. A. (1929). The reward value of a conditioned stimulus. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 31–55.