La autonomía del Estado y el imperio de la ley. Notas para una teoría del Estado desarrollista

Contenido principal del artículo

Christian Anglade

Resumen

El papel del Estado en el proceso de desarrollo es función de su capacidad de cumplir con sus responsabilidades constitucionales y en particular de aplicar la ley. El poder limitado que tiene para hacer cumplir el imperio de la ley limita a su vez el papel desarrollista del Estado en América Latina, y esa limitación es el resultado de la fragmentación del control social que prevalece en el área.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Anglade, C. (2015). La autonomía del Estado y el imperio de la ley. Notas para una teoría del Estado desarrollista. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas Y Sociales, 44(177-8). https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2000.177-8.48937

Citas

Adelman, I. y S. Robinson, Income Distribution Policy in Developing Countries-A Case Study of Korea, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 1978.

Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report, Londres, Amnesty International, 1982.

Amnesty International, Brazil-Authorized Violence in Rural Areas, Londres, Amnesty.

Amsden, A., “The State and Taiwan’s Economic Development”, en P. Evans, D.

Anglade, C. y C. Fortín, “Accumulation, Adjustment and the Autonomy of the State in Latin America”, en C. Anglade and C. Fortín (eds.), The State and Capital Accumulation in Latin America, vol. 2, Londres, Macmillan, 1990.

Anglade, C., “La democracia y el imperio de la ley en América Latina”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, núm. 163, 1996, pp. 75-95.

Barrera, M., “Political Participation and Social Exclusion of the Popular Sectors in Chile”, en P. Oxhorn y P.K. Starr (eds.), Markets and Democracy in Latin America, Conflict or Convergence?, Boulder, Lynne Rienner, 1999.

Barsh, R.L., “Democratization and Development”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 14, núm. 1, 1992, pp. 120-134.

Bird, R.M., “Tax Reform in Latin America: A Review of Some Recent Experiences”, Latin American Research Review, vol. 27, núm. 1, 1992, pp. 7-36.

Birdsall, N. y R. Sabot, “Inequality, Exports and Human Capital in East Asia: Lessons for Latin America”, en C. Bradford (ed.), Re- defining the State in Latin America, París, oecd, 1994.

Borner, S., A. Brunetti y B. Weder, Political Credibility and Economic Development, Londres, Macmillan, 1995.

Bulmer-Thomas, V. (ed.), The New Economic Modelin Latin America and its Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty, Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1996.

Buscaglia, E., “Corruption and Judicial Reform in Latin America”, Policy Studies, vol. 17, núm. 4, 1996, pp. 273-286.

Centro de Estudios de Opinión-Universidad de Guadalajara, Encuestas de Opinión, Guadalajara, 1998.

Centro de Estudios Públicos, Estudio Nacional de Opinión Publica, núm. 6, Santiago de Chile, 1997.

Dahl, R. A., Polyarchy, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971.

International, 1988.Evans, P., "The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy and Structural Change", en S. Haggardy R. Kauffman (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment, Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press, 1992.

Geddes, B., Politician’s Dilemma; Building State Capacity in Latin America, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1994.

Grindle, M. S.," Sustaining Economic Recovery in Latin America: State Capacity, Markets, and Politics", en G. Birdy A Helwege (eds.), Latin America’s Economic Future, Londres, Academic Press, 1994.

Haggard, S., "The Reform of the State in Latin America",en S. J. Burki, S. Edwards y S. R. Aiyer (eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development in Latin America and the Caribbean 1995, Washington, D. C., The World Bank, 1997.

Hagopian, F., Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Hamilton, C., "Capitalist Industrialization in East Asia's Four Little Tigers”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 13, núm. 1, 1983, pp. 35-73.

Ho, S. P. S., "The Development Policy of the Japanese Colonial Government in Taiwan, 1895-1945”, en G. Ranis (ed.), Government and Economic Development, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1971.

Holston, J., "The Misrule of Law; Land and Usurpation in Brazil", Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 33, núm. 4, 1991, pp. 695-725.

Human Rights in Developing Countries Yearbook, The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 1995-1996-1997.

Huntington, S. P., Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press, 1968.

Instituto de Ciencia Política de la Universidad de Chile, Encuesta INJ- Universidad de Chile-Juventud y Política, Santiago de Chile, 1996.

Kang, D. C., "South Korean and Taiwanese Development and the New Institutional Economics", International Organization, vol. 49, núm. 3, pp. 555-87.

Kelsen, H., The General Theory of Law and State, Nueva York, Russell and Rusell, 1945.

Koo, A Y. C., The Role of Lund Reform in Economic Development. A Case Study of Taiwan, Nueva York, Praeger, 1968.

Krueger, A., “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society", American Economic Review, vol. 64, núm. 3, 1974, pp. 291-303.

Krueger, A., "Government Failures in Development", Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 4, núm. 3, 1990, pp. 9-23.

Kuznets, Economic Growth and Structure in the Republic of Korea, New Haven, Conn., Yale University Press, 1977.

Lewis, W. A., "Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour", Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22 (May), 1953, pp. 139-191.

Lipton, M, "Land Reform as Commenced Business: The Evidence Against Stopping", World Development, vol. 21, núm. 4, 1993, pp. 641-657.

Mainwaring, S. y T. R Scully (eds.), Building Democratic Institutions- Party Systems in Latin America, Stanford, Ca., Stanford University Press, 1995.

Migdal, J., Stmng Societies and Weak States, Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press, 1988.

MORI-Argentina, Latinobarómetro Argentina, Buenos Aires, 1998.

Myrdal, G., Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, Harmondsworth, Pelican Books, 1968.

Naqvi S. N. H., "The Significance of Development Economics", World Development, vol. 24, núm. 6, 1996, pp. 975-987.

Nolte, D., "De 'la larga agonía de la Argentina peronista' a la 'reconversión menemista’”, en W. Hofmeistery J. Tesing (eds.), Transformación de los sistemas políticos en América Latina, Buenos Aires, CIEDLA, 1995.

North, D. C., Structure and Change in Economic History, Nueva York, Norton, 1981.

North, D. C.,, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Mass., Cambridge University Press, 1990.

O’Donnell, G., "On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Post-communist Countries", World Development, vol. 21, núm. 8, 1993, pp. 1355-69.

Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action-Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (edición revisada), Nueva York, Schocken Books, 1971.

Olson, M., The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven y Londres, Yale University Press, 1982.

Paukert, F., J. Skolka y J. Maton, Income Distribution, Structured Economy and Employment. The Philippines, Iran, The Republic of Korea and Malaysia, Londres, Croom Helm, 1981.

Posner, P. W., "Popular Representation and Political Dissatisfaction in Chile's New Democracy”, Journal of Inter American Studies and World Affairs, vol. 41, núm. 1, 1999, pp. 59-85.

Ranis, G., "Another Look at the East Asian Miracle", The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 9, núm. 3, 1995, pp. 509-34.

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, novena impresión, 1989.

Rodrik, D., "Political Economy and Development Policy", European Economic Review, núm. 36, 1992, pp. 329-336.

Rodrik, D., “King Kong Meets Godzilla: The World Bank and The East Asian Miracle", en A. Fishlow, C. Gwin, S. Haggard, D. Rodrik, R. Wade, Miracle or Design? Lessons from the East Asian Experience, Washington, D. C., Overseas Development Council, 1995.

Roniger, L., Hierarchy and Trust in Modern Mexico and Brazil, Nueva York, Praeger, 1994.

Rueschemeyer y T. Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

Rueschemeyer y T. Skocpol (eds.), “A Theory of Government Intervention in Late Industrialization”, en L. Putterman y D.

Rueschemeyer (eds.), State and Market in Development: Synergy or Rivalry, Boulder y Londres, Lynne Rienner, 1992.

Sinha, R, "Economic Reform in Developing Countries: Some Conceptual Issues", World Development, vol. 23, núm. 4, 1995, pp. 557-75.

Streeten, P., "Markets and States: Against Minimalism", World Development, vol. 21, núm. 8, 1993, pp. 1281-98.

Weiss, L, y J. Hobson, States and Economic Development, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995.

Wilkinson, R. G., Poverty and Progress, Londres, Methuen & Co., 1973.

World Bank, Governance and Development, Washington, D. C, The World Bank, 1992.

World Bank, The East Asian Miracle. Economic Growth and Public Policy, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 1993.

World Bank, World Development Report 1997. The State in a Changing World, Nueva York, Oxford University Press, 1997.