Retained Canine Traction by Bone Anchorage Device. A Case Report
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Given the high prevalence of retained canines, the use of mini-implants is an effective therapeutic tool, offering absolute anchorage and allowing controlled movements without compromising adjacent teeth. Objective: To position a retained canine into the dental arch, establishing optimal dental relationships to provide good occlusal and articular function, and enhancing dental and facial aesthetics. Case report: Orthodontic management was performed on a 15-year-old female patient with a deep bite and the presence of a retained canine. A 2.5 x 1.6 x 8 mm DewimedÒ O.S.A.S. (Orthodontic Skeletal Anchorage System) self-drilling mini-implant was used for canine traction, and a standard 0.022” Damon™ Q (Ormco™ Amersfoort, Netherlands) fixed self-ligating appliance to establish a correct occlusion. Conclusion: The use of mini screws is an excellent therapeutic option in the management of retained teeth because they allow controlled movements, avoiding the effect of reciprocal forces.
Article Details
Citas en Dimensions Service
References
Dalessandri D, Parrini S, Rubiano R, Gallone D, Migliorati M. Impacted and transmigrant mandibular canines incidence, aetiology, and treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2017; 39(2): 161-169. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjw027
Torres-Lagares D, Flores-Ruíz R, Infante-Cossío P, García-Calderón M, Gutiérrez-Pérez JL. Transmigration of impacted lower canine. Case report and review of literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006; 11(2): E171-E174. Disponible en: https://www.medicinaoral.com/pubmed/medoralv11_i2_pE171.pdf
Camilleri S, Scerri E. Transmigration of mandibular canines. A review of the literature and a report of five cases. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73(6): 753-762. Disponible en https://angle-orthodontist.kglmeridian.com/downloadpdf/view/journals/angl/73/6/article-p753.pdf
Javid B. Transmigration of impacted mandibular cuspids. Int J Oral Surg. 1985; 14(6): 547-549. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9785(85)80063-6
Ericson S, Kurol J. Early treatment of palatally erupting maxillary canines by extraction of the primary canines. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10(4): 283-295. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/10.4.283
Bishara SE. Ortho D. Impacted maxillary canines: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992; 101(2): 159-171. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X
Oberoi S, Knueppel S. Three-dimensional assessment of impacted canines and root resorption using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113(2): 260-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.035
Migliorati M, Cevidanes L, Sinfonico G, Drago S, Dalessandri D, Isola G, et al. Three-dimensional movement analysis of maxillary impacted canine using TADs: a pilot study. Head Face Med. 2021;17(1): an1. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-020-00252-0
Molina-Coral A, Población M, Díez-Cascón M. Microtornillos como anclaje en ortodoncia. Revisión de la literatura. Rev Esp Ortod. 2004; 34(4): 319-334. Disponible en: https://www.revistadeortodoncia.com/frame_esp.php?id=724
Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(5): e6-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.022
Schätzle M, Männchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang L. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(12): 1351-1359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(4): 373-378. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00565-1
Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2007; 8(1): 192-201. Disponible en https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cesare-Luzi/publication/6257675_A_prospective_clinical_investigation_of_the_failure_rate_of_immediate_loaded_mini-implants_used_for_orthodontic_anchorage/links/59f78f74a6fdcc075ec7bbd0/A-prospective-clinical-investigation-of-the-failure-rate-of-immediate-loaded-mini-implants-used-for-orthodontic-anchorage.pdf
Iniestra Iturbe O, Grageda Núñez E, Álvarez Gayosso C, Guerrero Ibarra J. Resistencia a fuerzas de tracción de miniimplantes usados en ortodoncia dependiendo del ángulo de inserción. Rev Mex Ortodon. 2014; 2(3): 187-191 DOI: 10.1016/S2395-9215(16)30033-2
Pickard MB, Dechow P, Rossouw PE, Buschang PH. Effects of miniscrew orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1): 91-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.034
Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19(1): 100-106. PMID: 14982362
Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(6): 415-423. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0415:ROIAEE>2.0.CO;2
Cernochova P, Krupa P, Izakovicova-Holla L. Root resorption associated with ectopically erupting maxillary permanent canines: a computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(5): 483-491. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq085
Revista Odontológica Mexicana por Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Basada en una obra en http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom.