Simulation of Mini-screw Fracture when Inserted into the Mandibular Body, through Finite Element Analysis

Main Article Content

Camila María Mendoza-Escobar
Víctor Manuel Araujo-Monsalvo
Ricardo Ondarza-Rovira
Salvador García-López

Abstract

Introduction: Finite element analysis helps to predict the stress, compression, and deformation of a body under load. Objective: To assess the fracture risk of a stainless steel mini-screw when inserted into the mandibular body using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: A 3D-printed mandibular model was obtained from a CBCT of a patient with class III malocclusion. A 2 x 12 mm long stainless steel mini-screw was then inserted into the mandibular body of the model to simulate the same direction in the tomography; 150 slices were obtained from the volumetric tomography, which was imported into the InVesalius 3.1.1 program. The tension levels exerted at 10 N-cm and 14 N-cm were measured at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mm depths, both in the mini-screw and in the bone of the insertion area of the mandibular body. Results: When the mini-screw was inserted at 2 mm depth, at 10 N-cm2 and 14 N-cm2, the mini-screw presented greater tension at the tip and the circumferential bone edge of the insertion. When inserted at 10 mm, the mini-screw received greater tension in the body's upper part and neck. In the images, we observed that the self-tapping mini-screw received greater tension at the neck and upper part of the body than the self-drilling mini-screws, which received tension at the tip. A greater statistically significant difference was shown at 14 N-cm2 compared to 10 N-cm2. Conclusions: It is suggested to use self-drilling stainless steel mini screws of 2 mm width and 12 mm length in the first instance, applying a force of 10 to 12 N cm2 to achieve optimal stability, decreasing the force when fully inserting the mini screw to avoid fracture of its head.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mendoza-Escobar, C. M., Araujo-Monsalvo, V. M., Ondarza-Rovira, R., & García-López, S. (2025). Simulation of Mini-screw Fracture when Inserted into the Mandibular Body, through Finite Element Analysis. Revista Odontológica Mexicana, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2025.29.3.94256

Citas en Dimensions Service

References

Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997; 31(11): 763-767. PMID: 9511584

Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131(4, Suppl): S43-S51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027

Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19(1): 100-106. PMID: 14982362

Lin TS, Tsai FD, Chen CY, Lin LW. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to the orthodontic anchorage mini-implant with finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143(2): 182-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.012

Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh CH, Tseng YC, Shen YS, Huang IY, et al. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(8): 1209-1213. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.016

Lin JJJ. The most effective and simplest ways of treating severe class III, without extraction or surgery. IJOI. Int J Orthod Implantol. 2014; 33: 4–18. Disponible en: https://iaoi.pro/asset/files/ijoi_33_pdf_article/004_018_new.pdf

Inaba M. Evaluation of primary stability of inclined orthodontic mini-implants. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51(3): 347-353. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.51.347

Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(1): 18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032

Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Gröbel KH, Köllner HG. Influence of different pilot hole sizes on torque measurements and pullout analysis of osteosynthesis screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998; 26(1): 50-55. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80035-8

Phillips JH, Rahn BA. Comparison of compression and torque measurements of self-tapping and pretapped screws. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 83(3): 447-456. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198903000-00007

Campbell JH. Titanium screw failure: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51(5): 603-605. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80526-9

Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(1): 109-114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x

Tseng LLY, Chang CH, Roberts WE. Diagnosis and conservative treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite and asymmetric maxillary crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149(4): 555-566. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.042

Buschang PH, Carrillo R, Ozenbaugh B, Rossouw PE. 2008 survey of AAO members on miniscrew usage. J Clin Orthod. 2008; 42(9): 513-518. PMID: 18974458

Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Moment-to-force ratio, center of rotation, and force level: a finite element study predicting their interdependency for simulated orthodontic loading regimens. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(5): 681-689. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.038

Farah JW, Craig RG, Sikarskie DL. Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis of a restored axisymmetric first molar. J Biomech. 1973; 6(5): 511-520. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(73)90009-2

Brown RN, Sexton BE, Chu TMG, Katona TR, Stewart KT, Kyung HM et al. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic miniscrew implants: a mechanical and histologic analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(4): 496-504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.12.022